Stuart Cooper’s Overlord

Stuart Cooper’s Overlord (1975) is defined by fluctuations. The story concerns Thomas, a young boy who signs up with a British army regiment and takes part in the storm on Normandy Beach on D-Day. The film fluctuates between time periods, flitting between Thomas’ past, present, and future, to create an artistic impression of the life of a soldier.

The film is also notable for the fluctuations between visuals. Shot by cinematographer John Alcott (who made his name doing cinematography for Stanley Kubrick, starting with A Clockwork Orange (1971), Barry Lyndon (1975), and The Shining (1980), also taking over as lighting camerman during the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)), the film skips effortlessly between images of Thomas and those around him as they prepare for war and  actual documentary footage from the Second World War. This contrast adds a sense of realism to the film, and illustrates the hugeness of the situation surrounding our protagonist.

A major concern of the film is man’s size in the huge machine of the military. During one notable scene, Thomas writes a letter to his parents where he feels like he is shrinking in size until he will ultimately disappear; as the letter is dictated in his head, the camera pulls back until he is a tiny figure in the shot, before ultimately fading to more documentary footage where Thomas is no longer seen, nor are any people particularly recognizable.

Overlord is a tremendous film that is helped along by superb visuals and a phenomenal acting job by its lead, Brian Stimer, playing Thomas. Despite winning the Silver Bear at the Berlin Film Festival upon its release, the film has faded into relative obscurity since then. Perhaps this is because it is not as immediate and arresting as many of the other war films from the time (of which there are plenty). It has also been suggested that perhaps its message isn’t as blatant and pigeonholable as other movies from the time period and as such was forgotten. Whatever the reason, Overlord is a truly fabulous example of war cinema and deserves significantly more recognition than it receives.

Elem Klimov’s Come and See

Elem Klimov’s Come and See (1985) is one of the most powerful movies I have ever seen. During the Nazi occupation of Byelorussian SSR, young Florian Gaishun finds a rifle and joins the partisan rebellion. As is typical with these films, Florya begins to lose his innocence as he witnesses the horrors of war. Despite its typical thematic materials, Come and See distinguishes itself from other war films by the brutal and relentless mental warfare it wages upon the viewer.

As Florya witnesses the death and destruction that begins to surround him, the viewer is taken alongside him, witnessing everything with the same savagery that Florya does. Klimov powerfully has his characters look and speak directly into the camera. This breaks down the boundary between the viewer and what is happening to the characters on-screen. As opposed to witnessing everything from behind a veil, the audience is directly addressed by the characters, directly implicating the viewer.

Apart from the visuals, Klimov uses sound to constantly weigh down the viewer, extending his mental assault upon them. After Florya narrowly survives an air raid, he is rendered temporarily deaf. The soundtrack is filled with a shrill ringing and an oppressive ambient tone. While the ringing fades away, the heavy, muddy sound never leaves the soundtrack, forcing the viewer to listen beyond it to get the full story. The sounds are atonal and leave the viewer physically uncomfortable, but beyond that they are no longer able to clearly hear what is going on.

Come and See left me nauseous. It is one of the most effective psychological horror films I have ever seen. Watching the film is painful. There were many occasions when I simply wanted to turn away and forget what I had seen. Yet the film leaves you hooked. The acting is often ridiculous and over-the-top, intentionally so – as opposed to turning you off, it leaves you  uncomfortable and unable to relate to the events onscreen. Klimov’s film is brilliant, and I believe it to be one of the greatest films I have ever seen.

Mark Sandrich’s So Proudly We Hail

ImageMark Sandrich’s So Proudly We Hail! (1943) works as typical piece of U.S. propaganda, with one glaring exception. It is not a combat film; instead, the film tells the tale of a group of woman nurses and their experiences throughout the South Pacific.

Propaganda served to keep the morale high for everyone involved in the war effort, and So Proudly We Hail! is intended to show the sacrifices by those not directly fighting in combat. The women are portrayed as tough, taking cover from artillery fire and bombings alongside the soldiers, and handling the pressures just as well. However, the women experience minor hysteria, but it is always brief and is later laughed off as nerves.

Despite intending to show the female participants in the war as just as hardy and important as the men, the film is still littered with Hollywood’s typically sexist portrayal of women. For many of the characters, their husbands, boyfriends, and lovers are the most important thing they are holding on to. They fuss over their hair and outfits in typical “woman” fashion – one of them claims that the thing she longs for most on safe shores is a beauty parlor so she can finally get her hair done. While under fire from the Japanese, another nurse runs from the safety of her escape truck back to their house in order to retrieve a black dress, endangering not only her life, but the rest of her troop’s. However, this dress has added significance, as she wore it the night she first danced with her lover when they were all together and safe (thus, retrieving the dress has double-significance trivializing her as a silly woman).

Despite the sometimes stereotypical treatment of the female characters, they are shown in a positive light and the movie deserves credit for that. Featuring an A-list cast, the acting is believable and sympathetic. The film deserves most of its praise, however, for showing that war is not merely a man’s game, and that people from all walks of life make sacrifices in the name of our country.